Trail group calls for greater public say about proposed Silcote wind farm

By Denis Langlois, Owen Sound Sun Times

Officials at the Bruce Trail Conservancy say the charitable group is “neither for nor against” industrial wind turbines, but “objects strongly” to the lack of public consultation for the proposed Silcote Corners Wind Farm northeast of Owen Sound.

“The BTC is deeply concerned about the process that is being followed in siting these kinds of facilities. Under the Green Energy Act, local input to the decision-making is minimal to nonexistent,” Ed Hazell, president of the Hamilton-based group, wrote in a letter to Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty.

“We wish to reiterate our opposition to any project that does not take into account the impact on the escarpment environment, the views of the local community and in particular the landowners who are most affected by these projects. For this reason we object strongly to the process being followed for the Silcote Corners Wind Farm project.”

International Power Canada has announced plans to erect 26 wind turbines, capable of producing 48.6 megawatts of electricity, in an area near Annan.

The proponents are waiting to find out if there’s capacity in the area’s transmission system to take electricity produced by the turbines, company officials told Meaford council in May.

The Bruce Trail Conservancy wrote a letter to McGuinty on Feb. 18. Executive director Beth Kümmling said the group received a letter back from the premier’s office, which says their letter has been received and forwarded to the Ministry of the Environment. The group has not yet received a response from the MOE, she said.

Kümmling said the purpose of their letter was not to object to the Silcote Corners project, but to urge the province to consider “more carefully” the views of local residents and “take their views into account in a more meaningful way.

“It’s our observation that the process that these types of things follow is not appropriate,” she said in an interview this week.

The Bruce Trail Conservancy decided to add its voice to the discussion on the proposed wind farm because the plan is to install turbines in an area that includes “land on and adjacent to the Niagara Escarpment and the Bruce Trail,” the letter to McGuinty says.

“In the course of our work in establishing and maintaining the Bruce Trail, our volunteers maintain close contact with landowners along the trail route who allow passage of the trail across their land. In recent discussions with landowners in the vicinity of the Silcote project, we have come to understand how disruptive and divisive the project has been to the local residents.

“Many residents are landowners along our trail and/or members of our organization. They have their personal views on the proposal, some for and some against, many raising concerns about health impacts, devaluation of their land, and general loss of aesthetic enjoyment of the rural landscape.

“In April 2009 we wrote to the province expressing our concern over the implications of Bill 150, which, under the Green Energy Act, overrides local planning considerations and the input of the local community.”

Kümmling said Bruce Trail Conservancy members, who are “deeply concerned” about the Silcote project, asked the group to make a formal statement on the plan.

4 thoughts on “Trail group calls for greater public say about proposed Silcote wind farm

  1. There is more and more researched findings everyday that wind energy can not provide substanable power to any area with having a reliable source to compensate for the demand of power,gas,coal or nuclear we still be the areas main power source,although geothermal is a better choice for renewable energy the government does not give enough tax breaks and incentives yet to make the better choice.@people all over the world need to stand up for where our tax dollars are going because everywhere wind turbines go studies are show c02 emissions have more than doubled because the actual providing power plants must ramp up and down to provide a balanced supply to the grid. Wind will never be a reliable source of keep green energy and if it was then we would not need to have thousands of these turbines all over the world, first we allow phase one with wind projects, 25 to 50 turbines, which gives the developers the ok, so after that they then proceed to say phase one is not producing what they had calculated so then phase two is needed more turbines and the more transmission lines are also needed, it just keeps going. Maybe if we cover every mile in each country and america with wind turbines and transmission lines we might create the perfect power plant,but where will we live then? Right inside a great big breaker box that does not have enough constant power to meet our growing power needs,

    • Here we go again:

      Another conflicted bunch of “naturalists”. The Bruce Trail Conservancy, content to ride the fence during this whole IWT debacle, have decided that reality is getting too close for comfort and have opted to join the ranks of the Nimbys. Oh no, IWTs on our part of the trail system … say it isn’t so!

      Previously it was Ontario Nature, promoters and supporters of the Green Energy Act, who sat silent until the advent of the Holland Marsh gas peaker plant (York Energy Centre), required to back up intermittent wind power, being built a mere kilometer or two from their Cawthra Muloch Nature Reserve. Boo Hoo! And that’s not all: Power authorities wanted to make use of a utility right-of-way through the reserve property. Oh, the horrors, why can’t they put these damn things anywhere but here …

      So, step right up … what group will be the next to declare their “conflict of interest”?

  2. Who cares what the trail group feels?

    I wonder how it will effect hunting in the area ?

Comments are closed.