Wolfe Islanders challenging tax assessments

Wolfe Island Ferry Dock

PROPERTY: Residents claim wind turbines have depreciated the value of their homes

Posted By Paul Schliesmann, The Whig-Standard

Some Wolfe Island residents are challenging their tax assessments, claiming that 86 wind turbines installed in the community have hurt property values but a spokesman for the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation says the agency has seen no evidence to support the homeowners’ requests.

“It’s difficult for us to determine the effects of a wind turbine until they go to sell,” said Mike Contant, account manager for eastern Ontario.

“I’m not saying there won’t be. It’s a fairly new process.”

The spokeswoman for Wolfe Island Residents for the Environment said she and her husband have submitted their application for a reduction.

“We specifically referred to the turbines,” said Gail Kenney. “We stated that it was an introduction of industrialization into the rural area and that there has been an introduction of industrial noise and industrial lighting into the area.”

The turbines have become the centre of controversy on Wolfe Island.

Islanders who agreed to have turbines installed on their properties receive about $7,000 in annual rental fees for each unit. Some of those who didn’t say the towering structures have ruined the view and are noisy.

Victoria Stewart watched as two turbines were installed on her neighbours’ property, 400 metres and 500 metres from the back of her home.

She put her house up for sale in October, found no buyer, and will try again to sell this year.  Stewart wonders if the turbines are making it difficult.

She, too, has appealed to assessment corporation, stating that “any increase to my municipal taxes would only be deemed unjust.”

“I’m wondering if we should explore a class-action suit. We can’t just sit here and take the depreciation of our land,” Stewart said.

Contant said the corporation has been monitoring property values in western Ontario, where wind farms have been around a bit longer than on Wolfe Island.

“There is no impact,” Contant said. “There hasn’t been any influence yet. Right now we’re not seeing any impact on market value.”

The only way corporation will adjust assessments based on the proximity of wind turbines, Contant said, is if property sales within a two-kilometre range of the machines fall and if there is a 10% reduction in house prices.

Until then, he said, “MPAC will defend value based on sales.”

“We’ll fight our assessments. This could be a one-year process. It could be a five-year process. Until we see changes there’s nothing we can do.”

Last year there were 165 applications for reconsideration out of the 2,045 properties in the Township of Frontenac Islands.

Contant said the number of appeals was high because 2009 was a reassessment year for everyone in Ontario.  As of yesterday, there were just 19 requests for reconsideration in the township.

The deadline for reassessment applications is tomorrow.

Kenney said she doesn’t expect to win her case.

“I expect we’re not going to get anywhere with this appeal but it’s on file,” she said. “Next year we will file and the next year we will file again to make a point (which) is these wind turbines have not been an asset to all of Wolfe Island and they have detracted from the quality of life.”

pschliesmann@thewhig.com

4 thoughts on “Wolfe Islanders challenging tax assessments

  1. I would suggest the ONLY people who would want to buy a house on Wolfe Island nowadays would be a Wind Company or someone who is deaf dumb and blind!

    So sad!

  2. Quixote, am I to assume from your comment about the deaf, dumb, and blind that WTS/infrasound is indeed the ruse the majority of the world has always known it was?

  3. Mike, I believe Quixote covered that base with the word ‘dumb’. I also believe that ‘dumb’ encompasses most of the repetitive, inane rhetoric professed by most windies.

  4. “The only way corporation will adjust assessments based on the proximity of wind turbines, Contant said, is if property sales within a two-kilometre range of the machines fall and if there is a 10% reduction in house prices.”

    Do they include all the homes that went up for sale and COULD NOT SELL because of the turbines? It seems to me non-sales should be considered just as (if not more) important as reduced selling prices.

Comments are closed.